Steve Dower wrote:
> As a related aside, I've been getting GitHub Actions support together
> (which I started at the sprints).

Would adding support for GitHub Actions make it easier/faster to temporarily disable and re-enable specific CI services when they're having external issues? IIUC, that seems to be the primary concern to address.

Note that I'm not particularly well acquainted with GitHub Actions, other than briefly looking over https://github.com/features/actions.

On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:01 PM Steve Dower <steve.dower@python.org> wrote:
On 06Dec2019 0620, Victor Stinner wrote:
> What's the status? Right now, I see Travis CI jobs passing on 3.7,
> 3.8 and master branches so I don't understand the problem. Maybe the
> issue has been fixed and Travis CI can be made mandatory again?

They've been passing fine for me too, I'm not quite sure what the issue was.

As a related aside, I've been getting GitHub Actions support together
(which I started at the sprints). My test PR is at
https://github.com/zooba/cpython/pull/7 if anyone wants to check out
what it could look like. Feel free to leave comments there.

(One of these days I'll have to join core-workflow I guess...)

Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/MTD2EQC3BWEGEV3LNKPF3KEJBSQN24LS/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/