On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:55 AM, Vinay Sajip <vinay_sajip@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Yep, that's what I had assumed you were going to do (this did come up
> in the big thread about the logging docs, but you may have missed it).
>

Ok, I've now checked in this change, and would be grateful for any feedback.
Time for a break :-)

Hmm, that may not have built correctly, since it isn't showing up in the web version of the dev docs yet. I skimmed the diff on python-checkins though, and it looked good to me.

I think the revised docs should make it *much* easier for people to get a handle on how the logging system works (I know my own understanding of it is significantly better than it was a couple of weeks ago).

Cheers,
Nick.

P.S. I'm off visiting family for a couple of weeks, so my email access is going to be sketchy for a while.

--
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan@gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia