Le mercredi 13 avril 2016, Ryan Gonzalez &lt;<a href="mailto:rymg19@gmail.com">rymg19@gmail.com</a>&gt; a écrit :<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir="ltr">What is the value of HAS_ARG going to be now?</p></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I asked Demur to keep HAS_ARG(). Not really for backward compatibility, but for the dis module: to keep a nice assembler. There are also debug traces in ceval.c which use it.</div><div><br></div><div>For ceval.c, we might use HAS_ARG() to micro-optimize oparg=0 (hardcode 0 rather than reading the bytecode) for operators with no argument. Or maybe it&#39;s completly useless :-)</div><div><br></div><div>Victor </div>