June 10, 2016
1:53 a.m.
On Jun 09, 2016, at 03:22 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 06/09/2016 08:52 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
That leaves direct calls to os.urandom(). I don't think this should > block either.
Then it's you and me against the rest of the world ;-)
FWIW, I agree with you and Guido. I'm also not opposed to adding a more direct exposure of getrandom(), but in Python 3.6 only. Like it or not, that's the right approach for our backward compatibility policies. Cheers, -Barry