28 Jan
2001
28 Jan
'01
4:39 p.m.
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:14:15AM +0100, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
FYI: This misdefinition with LONG_BIT was due to a bug in glibc's limits.h. It has been fixed in glibc 2.96.
Do you mean gcc 2.96, or glibc 2.(1|2).96 ? Or is 2.96 some internal versioning for glibc that I was unaware of ? :) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!