http://bugs.python.org/issue1706256
Took me a couple days to catch up on this thread so here is the link
for any interested. Could it be possible to reevaluate this?
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Leif Walsh
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Calvin Spealman
wrote: I am just replying to the end of this thread to throw in a reminder about my partial.skip patch, which allows the following usage:
split_one = partial(str.split, partial.skip, 1)
Not looking to say "mine is better", but if the idea is being given merit, I like the skipping arguments method better than just the "right partial", which I think is confusing combined with keyword and optional arguments. And, this patch already exists. Could it be re-evaluated?
+1 but I don't know where the patch is.
-- Cheers, Leif
-- Read my blog! I depend on your acceptance of my opinion! I am interesting! http://techblog.ironfroggy.com/ Follow me if you're into that sort of thing: http://www.twitter.com/ironfroggy