Nov. 6, 2009
6:12 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:36 PM, <exarkun@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
Also, for Python 2.5 and earlier, any SSL-based code is vulnerable to a MitM anyway, so this can only be an issue for code using the new APIs in Python 2.6.
That's not going to stop the wannabe-self-proclaimed-so-called-vulnerability-"experts" from whining about Python not releasing updated binary distributions though. :-( -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)