1 May
2008
1 May
'08
2:38 p.m.
2008/5/1, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net>:
There may be more implications and surprising behavior surrounding this.
I know that the implementation is a compromise, but I'd rather see a super() whose full semantics can be explained to programmers without using to "cell variable", "f_localsplus" and "symtable".
In consideration of what's been said about super() in the past, and what is handled here regarding its Py3 implementation, I want to make a step back, and ask: Has super() proved more useful than harmful? Which is the value for Py3 to keep it? Regards, -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/