29 Jul
2018
29 Jul
'18
6:02 p.m.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Barath Aron
My question is that the _posixsubprocess.c can be prepared to use posix_spawn(3) instead of fork(2)? Maybe the UNIX/Linux version can also benefit from it, see: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-posix-spawn
There is an open issue to add os.posix_spawn() at https://bugs.python.org/issue20104 --Berker