On 28/05/2008, M.-A. Lemburg email@example.com wrote:
I'm beginning to wonder whether I'm the only one who cares about the Python 2.x branch not getting cluttered up with artifacts caused by a broken forward merge strategy.
I care, but I struggle to understand the implications and/or what is being proposed in many cases.
Recent examples are the ABC backports and the current thread (string C API). I simply don't follow the issues well enough to comment.
How can it be that we allow major C API changes such as the renaming of the PyString APIs to go into the trunk without discussion or a PEP ?
Christian has raised this a couple of times, but there has been little discussion. I suspect that this is because there is not enough clarity over the practical consequences. A PEP may help here, but I'm not sure how much - it could spark discussion, but would anyone actually end up any better informed?
We're having lengthy discussions about the addition of single method to an object, but such major changes just go in like that and nobody seems to really care.
I suspect deadline pressure and burnout are involved here.
In all honesty, there's been little or no work done on the C API, which is just as much in need of review and possible cleanup for 3.0 as the language. It's as close as makes no difference to too late now - does that mean we've lost the chance?