29 Jan
2001
29 Jan
'01
5:13 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 01:39:04AM +0100, Thomas Wouters wrote:
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 12:14:15AM +0100, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
FYI: This misdefinition with LONG_BIT was due to a bug in glibc's limits.h. It has been fixed in glibc 2.96.
Do you mean gcc 2.96, or glibc 2.(1|2).96 ? Or is 2.96 some internal versioning for glibc that I was unaware of ? :)
Sorry, it was fixed in glibc 2.1.96. Gregor