On 07/02/2011 14:28, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On 07/02/2011 12:25, Georg Brandl wrote:
Am 07.02.2011 00:21, schrieb Nick Coghlan:
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 6:53 AM, Brett Cannon
wrote: I would rather not have new hg users have to install an extension just to get a simple workflow going. I may still keep my Rdiff-based FAQ entry around as an example of how to get a collapsed diff regardless of personal workflow, though.
Installing Rdiff was actually pretty easy, and I get the impression that becoming comfortable with adding the extensions that suit your personal workflow is a key part in getting Mercurial to really work for you. We won't do people any favours if we try to pretend that isn't the case. This is quite true. (And after a while, the same goes for creating your own extensions, BTW.)
And from the description it sounds like rdiff will be very useful for our usecase. I'm not sure it is really. When you commit multiple changesets locally you really want to use something like named branches or mq to
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:27:31 +0000 Michael Foord
wrote: track them. Advocating rdiff is advocating something SVN-like, it's not very helpful IMO.
Although often you want to merge in a single commit and erase the commit history of the branch you worked in (as discussed previously). So are you advocating rebasing before merge as the alternative? Michael
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.u...
-- http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ May you do good and not evil May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others May you share freely, never taking more than you give. -- the sqlite blessing http://www.sqlite.org/different.html