data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3481/c3481638263af7c93d4c8a1f7b28d1cd5a9e96ff" alt=""
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 November 2013 23:17, Maciej Fijalkowski <fijall@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
If user input can trigger an assert, then the code should raise a normal exception that will not disappear with -OO.
May I assert that -OO should instead be killed?
"I don't care about embedded devices" is not a good rationale for killing features that really only benefit people running Python on such systems.
Cheers, Nick.
Can I see some writeup how -OO benefit embedded devices?
Or more importantly, how removing assert does. And how not naming it --remove-asserts would not help (people really have an opinion it would optimize their code)