On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:57 PM, <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:Hmm, I'm starting to wonder if there's something to this one - it
> results for aef7db0d3893 on branch "default"
> --------------------------------------------
>
> test_dbm leaked [2, 0, 0] references, sum=2
> test_dbm leaked [2, 2, 1] memory blocks, sum=5
seems to be popping up a bit lately.
I'm gonna take a wild guess and suggest there may be a problem with
> test_xml_etree_c leaked [56, 56, 56] references, sum=168
> test_xml_etree_c leaked [36, 38, 38] memory blocks, sum=112
the recent pickling fix in the C extension :)