"Martin" == Martin v Löwis
writes:
Martin> I have suggested a procedure in the past, which never has Martin> been executed so far. I promise that I will stick to it if Martin> somebody actually executes it. Here it goes: Martin> - For every patch you want to get reviewed, review 10 Martin> (ten) other patches. I think 10 is way too high; I would call it prohibitive for anyone who isn't already primarily a Python hacker. I agree it should be more than 1 for 1 for several reasons, but I'd be willing to bet you get excellent results from 3:1 or even 2:1. Even if you think that risks being a burden on your time, since you've had no takers yet (and it's been a while since the last time I saw your proposal), I'd say that lowering the "price" to 5:1 is a reasonable idea, and not very risky. You can always raise the price again if you get 50 useful reviews by next Tuesday.<wink> -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.