As a candidate for the new SC, if elected I would certainly find it more useful to have more specific thoughts from the outgoing SC than simply "we recommend." How divided was the vote? Who took the sides? What were the major points of disagreement? That sort of thing.

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 9:39 AM Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:

On Mon, 7 Dec 2020 11:29:55 -0800
Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
> After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to the
> 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was not a unanimous decision).
> This is in no way a binding recommendation to the 2021 SC (even if a
> majority of current council members get re-elected), but we felt we should
> pass on our thoughts to the next council as we have been discussing pattern
> matching for a few months at this point and we promised we would make some
> decision to the PEP authors.

Perhaps you could also post the thought process which leads to this
recommendation, so that the future SC has more input on the matter?

Regards

Antoine.

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-leave@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/FTXGXG6UEULVIU56WAYLBEWMX6ZBFKXA/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

The dead increasingly dominate and strangle both the living and the
not-yet born. Vampiric capital and undead corporate persons abuse
the lives and control the thoughts of homo faber. Ideas, once born,
become abortifacients against new conceptions.