>> I discovered much to my chagrin today that the socket >> module's new timeout capability doesn't play well with file >> objects as returned by a socket's makefile method. Guido> Can you explain better how it doesn't work?When the socket is in non-blocking mode, reads on the file returned by .makefile() will fail with an IOError if there is nothing to return.
Isn't that exactly what a timeout is supposed to do? What would you have expected?
>> I would think the greatest use of timeouts would be using >> higher-level line-oriented modules like urllib and ftplib. In >> addition, since makefile() isn't always available, it seems >> worthwhile to implement something in socket.py, thus making >> makefile() universally available. Guido> Um, when is makefile() not available?I don't know. I was going by the doc string in socketmodule.c which says, in part:
... makefile([mode, [bufsize]]) -- return a file object for the socket [*]\n\ ... [*] not available on all platforms!");Maybe the docs are just wrong. According to the #ifdef in the code, if NO_DUP is defined (OS/2, Windows, BeOS), makefile() isn't.
That's the docs for the _socket module, which is (nowadays) an implementation detail. Read socket.py instead.
Guido> There's code for Windows that emulates it, returning a Guido> file-like object. Maybe that code should be enabled Guido> universally rather than only on Windows...That sounds similar to what is in timeoutsocket.py. It would have the advantage of providing identical semantics across all platforms.
Again, I won't have time to do this until after I'm back from Python UK, so I'd appreciate it if someone helped with this, e.g. by filing a patch.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)