On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 12:18 AM, Chris Barker <chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:13 AM, Joni Orponen <j.orponen@4teamwork.ch> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Chris Barker - NOAA Federal < chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
And maybe we could even get rid of the "Framework" builds......
Please do not. These make life easier for doing things the Apple way for signed sandboxed applications.
For the record, are you re-distributing the python.org builds, or re-building yourself?
We are re-building ourselves.
Then it makes no difference to you if the pyton.org binaries are Framework builds... though maybe you want the configure target available.
And if the official distribution distributes a Framework, the configure target and build for that are also actually maintained, which will keep them likelier usable. Would we not be doing a couple of very specific things, we'd be able to use the distributed Framework as well. It is not unconceivable we could use it as-is in the future or for other projects. -- Joni Orponen