Aug. 7, 2005
9:15 p.m.
Ilya Sandler wrote:
Should pdb's next command accept an optional numeric argument? It would specify how many actual lines of code (not "line events") should be skipped in the current frame before stopping, [...] What do you think?
That would differ from gdb's "next <n>", which does "next" n times. It would be confusing if pdb accepted the same command, but it meant something different. Plus, there is always a chance that <current line>+n is never reached, which would also be confusing. So I'm -1 here. Regards, Martin