
July 25, 2009
4:13 a.m.
Antoine Pitrou <solipsis <at> pitrou.net> writes:
In any case, you seem to be right on this particular point: the PyGC_Head union should probably contain a "double" alternative in addition to the "long double" (and perhaps even a "long long" one).
Sorry, I realize that this doesn't really address the point.
I don't realize that. Why is your first proposal bad?
In addition to that union, we should also have a particular mechanism to compute what the proper offset should be between the PyGC_Head and the PyObject.
Why is that difficult? It's sizeof(PyGC_Head). Regards, Martin