I just checked with Van and we should have CLAs for even PEP contributors, so it will have to go through the same steps as the other ancillary repositories. On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 14:41 Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 14:31 Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
The wording is totally fine! You might still want to revert it and re-commit it so it doesn't look like a mistake when reviewing the log.
Sure thing!
BTW When can we start using git for the peps repo?
Depends on how fast the parts covered in https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/#requirements-for-code-only-reposit... and https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0512/#requirements-for-web-related-repos... takes. My hope is before PyCon US (although if we choose to not enforce the CLA on PEP contributions then it could happen even faster).
-Brett
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 at 10:45 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 1/20/2016 12:45 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 at 19:33 Martin Panter <vadmium+py@gmail.com <mailto:vadmium%2Bpy@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 19 January 2016 at 20:12, Brett Cannon <brett@python.org <mailto:brett@python.org>> wrote: > Here is a proposed update: > > diff -r 633f51d10a67 pep-0007.txt > --- a/pep-0007.txt Mon Jan 18 10:52:57 2016 -0800 > +++ b/pep-0007.txt Tue Jan 19 12:11:44 2016 -0800 > @@ -75,9 +75,9 @@ > } > > * Code structure: one space between keywords like ``if``, ``for`` and > - the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren; braces may be > - omitted where C permits but when present, they should be
formatted
> - as shown:: > + the following left paren; no spaces inside the paren;
braces are
> + strongly preferred but may be omitted where C permits, and
they
> + should be formatted as shown:: > > if (mro != NULL) { > ...
This change seems to be accidentally smuggled in, in the guise of
a
PEP 512 update :)
Darn, sorry about that; forgot I had that change sitting in my peps checkout. I'll revert it when I get home (unless the change is
actually
acceptable to Guido).
I thought that the above was your intentional compromise change given the range of opinions ;-).
It is, but Guido is the author of PEP 7 and so I didn't want to check in the change without his approval first.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)