Greg Ewing wrote:
Adam Olsen wrote:
Such a division would make it unnecessarily hard to find documentation on True, False, None, etc. They've become keywords for pragmatic purposes (to prevent accidental modification), not because we think they ideally should be syntax instead of builtins.
Maybe the solution is to rename the Library Reference to the Class and Module Reference or something like that.
Although DRY is fine as a programming principle, it fails for pedagogic purposes. We should therefore be prepared to repeat the same material in different contexts (hopefully by including some common documentation source rather than laborious and error-prone copy-and-paste).
Document things where people expect to find them. (Now *there's* a usability study screaming to be done ... and SoC is coming up).
regards Steve