30 Sep
2008
30 Sep
'08
12:36 p.m.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 5:24 AM, Stephen J. Turnbull <stephen@xemacs.org> wrote:
Adam Olsen writes:
[1] You could argue that Unicode should add new scalars to handle all currently invalid UTF-8 sequences.
AFAIK there are about 2^31 of these, though!
They've promised to never allocate above U+10FFFF (0 to 1114111). Not sure that makes new additions easier or harder. ;) -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus