data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e87f3/e87f3c7c6d92519a9dac18ec14406dd41e3da93d" alt=""
On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 at 00:59 Larry Hastings <larry@hastings.org> wrote:
On 01/17/2016 11:10 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
Anyone object if I update PEP 7 to remove the optionality of curly braces in PEP 7?
I'm -1. I don't like being forced to add the curly braces when the code is perfectly clear without them.
I'm going to assume you mean it is clearer without them, else I don't hear an argument against beyond "I don't wanna". For me, I don't see how:: int x = do_something(); if (x != 10) return NULL; do_some_more(); is any clearer or more readable than:: int x = do_something(); if (x != 10) { return NULL; } do_some_more();
If this was a frequent problem then I'd put up with it, but I can't recall ever making this particular mistake myself or seeing it in CPython source. It seems to me like a fix for a problem we don't have.
I personally have come close to screwing up like this, but I caught it before I put up a patch. I honestly also prefer the consistency of just always using braces rather than the sometimes rule we have. It isn't like C is a pretty, safe language to begin with, so I would rather be consistent and avoid potential errors.