Le Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:37:48 -0400,
Terry Reedy
On 2.7, >>> license() return a text that includes a complete list of releases from 1.6 to 2.7 and stops there Release Derived Year Owner GPL- from compatible? (1)
0.9.0 thru 1.2 1991-1995 CWI yes 1.3 thru 1.5.2 1.2 1995-1999 CNRI yes 1.6 1.5.2 2000 CNRI no 2.0 1.6 2000 BeOpen.com no ... 2.6.5 2.6.4 2010 PSF yes 2.7 2.6 2010 PSF yes
Was it intentional to stop with 2.7 and not continue with 2.7.1, etc?
On 3.3.2, the 2.x list ends with 2.6.5 and never mentions 2.7. Intentional? It then jumps back to 3.0 and ends with the 'previous' release, 3.3.1. Should 3.3.2 be included in the 3.3.2 list?
... 2.6.4 2.6.3 2009 PSF yes 2.6.5 2.6.4 2010 PSF yes 3.0 2.6 2008 PSF yes 3.0.1 3.0 2009 PSF yes ... 3.2.4 3.2.3 2013 PSF yes 3.3.0 3.2 2012 PSF yes 3.3.1 3.3.0 2013 PSF yes
I don't really understand why the releases should be manually listed. Is it some kind of defensive coding? Regards Antoine.