June 17, 2005
11:23 p.m.
Guido van Rossum wrote:
On 6/17/05, Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettinger@verizon.net> wrote:
IIRC, there was a decision to not implement phase C and to keep the trailing L in representations of long integers. For 2.x, yes. I'm fine with marking it as Final and adding this to PEP 3000 instead.
Since PEP 313 has been rejected, the trailing L no longer introduces ambiguity in the representation of roman(40) vs. roman(10L). --Scott David Daniels Scott.Daniels@Acm.Org