July 29, 2018
1:57 a.m.
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:15 PM Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdonek@gmail.com> wrote:
Regardless of whether the tempfile or TESTFN approach is used, I think it would be best for a few reasons if the choice is abstracted behind a uniquely named test function (e.g. make_test_file if not already used).
+1, although my particular choice of color would be to add a pair of functions, mkstemp and mkdtemp, to match the style of test.support-wrapped library functions for use in the test harness. -- Jeremy Kloth