Paul Moore wrote:
2009/6/15 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>:
Raymond Hettinger wrote:
P.S. If you switch to PendingDeprecationWarning, the example in the docs should probably be switched to show the one valid use case (passing in a prepackaged nest of context managers). It could even suggest that it only be used for this, since it may disappear, and that other uses should use the new syntax. That would give people the best chance of writing future-proof code when they can.
And if the warning is *not* changed to a PendingDeprecationWarning, the documentation could also note the necessary warnings call needed to let the example code run warning-free.
I think I like that option even better than downgrading the warning. I created http://bugs.python.org/issue6288 to make it clear to Benjamin when I have finished updating the docs. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------