Feb. 16, 2007
9:09 a.m.
Nick Coghlan schrieb:
I'd like to repeat Guido's question: Why does this still need to support the tuple interface (i.e. indexed access)?
So that it remains interoperable with existing libraries that expect a tuple? Otherwise you'd be casting (and copying) every time you needed to pass it to something that used indexed access.
Can you give a few example, for libraries where this isn't already done? Regards, Martin