On 14 Jun 2015 19:17, "Guido van Rossum" <guido@python.org> wrote:
A good plan. I think this could be added to 3.5 still? It's a pretty
minor adjustment to the PEP 492 machinery, really. Good point - as per Ben's original post, the lack of it makes it quite hard to get a clear picture of the system state when using coroutines in the current beta. Cheers, Nick.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 14 Jun 2015 10:01, "Ben Leslie" <benno@benno.id.au> wrote:
If this seems like a good approach I'll try and work it in to a suitable patch for contribution.
I think it's a good approach, and worth opening an enhancement issue for.
I expect any patch would need some adjustments after Yury has finished
revising the async/await implementation to address some beta compatibility issues with functools.singledispatch and Tornado.
Cheers, Nick.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)