Does this mean that the implementation of Stackless 3.0 could be acceptable to integrate into CPython 2.5? It would be absolutely wonderful to have those capabilities available in the standard distribution! -Shane Holloway Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Eyal Lotem wrote:
Why is Python still not stackless?
But it is: http://www.stackless.com/
If you are asking: Why is python.org Python still not stackless? then I think the answer has varied over time.
The most recent answer is that no volunteer has stepped forward to make Python stackless. That, in turn, likely hasn't happened because it is hard to do, and because nobody has seen any reason to do so as you could always use Stackless Python.
Regards, Martin
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/shane.holloway%40ieee.org