15 Feb
2001
15 Feb
'01
6:25 p.m.
[Tim]
If it is truly opt-in (supposedly a configure option?), I'm all for it. I recall vaguely though that Jeremy or Tim thought that the patch touches lots of code even when one doesn't opt in.
Nope, not us. The patch is utterly harmless if not enabled, but dangerous if enabled (because it doesn't implement any critical sections -- see gobs of pre-release email about that).