8 Mar
2010
8 Mar
'10
8:53 p.m.
>> I'm +1 on adding a nice task queuing system, -1 on calling it by any >> other name. ;-) Nick> As Guido said, let's call the nice task queuing system "futures" Nick> and point people wanting a full-power asynchronous process model Nick> to Twisted Can this module at least be pushed down into a package? I think "concurrent" or "concurrency" were both suggested at one point. Skip