Aug. 22, 2009
9:09 a.m.
From my POV, this would be required in some form or another before such a scheme could actually work. Without it we end up with an improved win32text (good!)
I still think this would be actually bad. Instead, a new extension should be written, with a name that does not have "win32" as a substring, and that has no provision for guessing line breaks by inspecting files. Regards, Martin