On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:06, anatoly techtonik <techtonik@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 30.04.2011 16:53, anatoly techtonik wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:37 AM, R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The hardest part is debugging the TAL when you make a mistake, but
>>> even that isn't a whole lot worse than any other templating language.
>>
>> How much in % is it worse than Django templating language?
>
> I'm just guessing here, but I'd say 47.256 %.

That means switching to Django templates will make Roundup design
plumbing work 47.256% more attractive for potential contributors.

What if these "potential contributors" never surface? Then we've made a 47.256% change in attractiveness, which is a 1423.843% waste of time.