Jan. 4, 2007
12:38 a.m.
On 1/3/07, Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake@acm.org> wrote:
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 11:06, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
In #1626545, Anton Tropashko requests that object.h should be renamed, because it causes conflicts with other software.
I would like to comply with this requests for 2.6, assuming there shouldn't be many problems with existing software as object.h shouldn't be included directly, anyway.
+1
Maybe this should be done in a more systematic fashion? E.g. by giving all "internal" header files a "py_" prefix? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)