On 1/3/07, Fred L. Drake, Jr. firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 11:06, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
In #1626545, Anton Tropashko requests that object.h should be renamed, because it causes conflicts with other software.
I would like to comply with this requests for 2.6, assuming there shouldn't be many problems with existing software as object.h shouldn't be included directly, anyway.
Maybe this should be done in a more systematic fashion? E.g. by giving all "internal" header files a "py_" prefix?