On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 7/21/2011 2:58 AM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
I concur with Brett. Nothing good will come from backporting tests that aren't aimed at a specific bugfix.
They could catch reversions that otherwise would not be caught. This would mainly apply to 2.7. It would not be an issue for 3.2 if all fixes are forward ported to 3.3 and tested there (before pushing) where there are tests not in 3.2. If people fix in 3.2, test, commit, and push, and just assume OK in 3.3, the new test will not do any good until someone else runs them with the fix.
None of that contradicts what Raymond and Brett said. Backporting test improvements that aren't targeting specific known bugs does not make efficient use of limited development resources. Forward porting of any changes made to maintenance branches (or explicitly blocking same as being irrelevant), OTOH, is mandatory. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia