On 4 Apr 2021, at 11:34, Matthias Klose firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 4/4/21 4:44 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
Unless the mistake was just introduced, the mistake would have happened. One this severe would likely have been caught within the week or two before a final. But as Łukasz noted when announcing the change, .rcs are generally ignored.
Well, that's not true. I think for at least the past 3.8 and current 3.9 cycle I always tested the release candidates, and built them for various Linux architectures. And I'm filing issues marked as 'released-blocker' when I see regressions introduced, it's up to the release managers to determine if such changes are intended or not.
Can you show us an example of a release-blocker issue you reported?