Oct. 21, 2003
10:28 p.m.
Guido van Rossum wrote:
[...] Thanks for trying to bang some sense into this.
Personally, I still like the idea best to make
(x for x in S)
be an iterator comprehension
and
[x for x in S]
syntactic sugar for the common operation
list((x for x in S))
Would this mean: [x for x in S] is a list comprehension and [(x for x in S)] is a list containing one generator expression? Bye, Walter Dörwald