23 Jul
2010
23 Jul
'10
12:26 a.m.
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl@gmx.net> wrote:
Sure -- I don't think this is a showstopper for regex. However if we don't include regex in a future version, we might think about increasing MAXCACHE a bit, and maybe not clear the cache when it reaches its max length, but rather remove another element.
Yikes, I didn't know it did that. That certainly sounds like it should be an RFE in its own right - some basic form of Least Recently Used accounting should be beneficial (although the extra bookkeeping might hurt scripts that aren't hitting the cache limit). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia