On 22 November 2017 at 20:05, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com> wrote
2017-11-22 9:58 GMT-08:00 Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>:

(OTOH, await in the same position must keep working since it's not broken and not unintuitive either.)

This is very questionable IMO.

So do you think that [await x for y in z] and list(await x for y in z) being not equivalent is intuitive?

Ivan