24 Jan
2009
24 Jan
'09
11:34 p.m.
Second, I think it would be good to explicitly mention the option of deferring this PEP. Based on previous discussion, it sounds like there are a fair number of people who think that there is a DVCS in Python's future, but not now (where "now" means over the next couple of years).
Sure, I can add a note somewhere that says if a clear winner doesn't come about the PEP can be revisited to a later date.
I think the request is slightly different: consider that a potential outcome should be "svn for the next five years, then reconsider" - not because none of the DVCS is a clear winner, but because there is too much resistance to DVCSes in general, at the moment. Regards, Martin