Oct. 27, 2009
12:02 a.m.
On Oct 26, 2009, at 6:45 PM, exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote:
Despite what I said above, however, I would also take a default position against adding any kind of more advanced scheduling system here. It would, perhaps, make sense to expose the APIs for controlling the platform scheduler, though.
I would also like to have an exposed API and optional profiling (optional as in conditional compilation, not as in some sort of profiling 'flag' that slows down non-profiling runs) so that you can see what's going on well enough to use the API to tune a particular platform for a particular workload. S