On 04:42 pm, olemis@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:13 AM, <exarkun@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
On 12:48 pm, ctb@msu.edu wrote:
[snip]
The most *exciting* part of pony-build, apart from the always- riveting spectacle of "titus rediscovering problems that buildbot solved 5 years ago", is the loose coupling of recording server to the build slaves and build reporters. �My plan is to enable a simple and lightweight XML-RPC and/or REST-ish interface for querying the recording server from scripts or other Web sites. �This has Brett aquiver with anticipation, I gather -- no more visual inspection of buildbot waterfall pages ;)
BuildBot has an XML-RPC interface. �So Brett can probably do what he wants with BuildBot right now.
... but pony-build follows a different model
But BuildBot exists, is deployed, and can be used now, without waiting. (Sorry, I don't really understand what point you were hoping to make with your message, so I just thought I'd follow up in the same style and hope that you'll understand my message even if I don't understand yours :). Jean-Paul