On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 01:33:49AM +0200, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Christian Robottom Reis wrote:
Hello there,
Now that the LC_NUMERIC patch has gone in (and we're set to live with it for the forseeable future) would it make sense to update the PEP and have it added to the PEP list? It would at least count as "complete" documentation for the change in the upcoming What's New document.
How do people feel about this?
I don't like documentation inside PEPs. Documentation should live inside the documentation.
Well, maybe I should have used the word "change rationale" instead of documentation. In any case, the document describes the original problem statement, potential solutions, and the process through which a solution was devised. Is the general opinion it's not worth being published? Take care, -- Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331