14 Jul
2006
14 Jul
'06
11:30 a.m.
Greg> Maybe there could be an "unstable" release phase that lasts for a Greg> whole release cycle. So you'd first release version 2.n as Greg> "unstable", and keep 2.(n-1) as the current "stable" release. Then Greg> when 2.(n+1) is ready, 2.n would become "stable" and 2.(n+1) would Greg> become the new "unstable". In GCC don't they do an odd (stable)/even (unstable) release schedule? Same for Linux kernels? Would that help? Skip