June 19, 2002
8:43 p.m.
"Gregory P. Smith" <greg@electricrain.com> writes:
If I hadn't made the initial mistake of naming pybsddb's module bsddb3 when i first extended robin's berkeleydb 2.x module to work with 3.0 I would agree with that name. I worry that having a module named bsddb2 might cause endless confusion as bsddb and bsddb3 already exist and did correlate to the version number. How about 'berkeleydb'?
What does it have to do with the city of Berkeley (CA)? Perhaps "sleepycat"? Regards, Martin