[Andrew Kuchling]
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 09:29:51AM -0400, Fran?ois Pinard wrote:
[1] Full stops are punctuation ending sentences with two spaces guaranteed. Full stops are defined that way for typography based on fixed width fonts, like when we say "this many characters to a line".
I don't think this really matters, because I doubt anyone will be implementing full justification.
This is an orthogonal matter, unrelated to full stops. Simultaneous left and right justification for fixed fonts texts is _not_ to be praised[1]. The real goal of any typographical device, like wrapping, is improving the legibility of text. Maybe simultaneous left and right justification is more "good looking", some would even say "beautiful", but I think it is considered well known that such simultaneous justification signficiatnly decreases legibility for fixed width fonts. If a typographical device aims beauty instead of legibility, it misses the real goal.
Left justification is just a matter of inserting newlines at particular points, so if the input data has two spaces after punctuation, line-breaking won't introduce any errors.
Excellent if it could be done exactly this way. However, things are not always that simple. If a newline is inserted at some point for wrapping purposes, it is desirable and usual to remove what was whitespace around that point, so we do not have unwelcome spaces at start of the beginning line, or spurious trailing whitespace at end of the previous line. If the wrapping device otherwise replaces sequences of many spaces by one, it should be careful at replacing many space by two, in context of full stops. ---------- [1] I think, shudder and horror, that `man' does simultaneous left and right justification when producing ASCII pages, this is especially bad since `man' is about documentation to start with. Of course, when generating pages for laser printers, with proportional fonts and micro-spacing, things are pretty different, and _then_ simultaneous left and right justification makes sense for legibility, if kept within reasonable bounds of course. I'm almost sure that all of us have seen dubious and unreasonable usages. -- François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard