On 5 March 2013 13:21, Michael Foord firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
We can certainly talk about it - although as Guido says, something specific may be easier to have a useful discussion about.
Reading through your blog articles it seemed like a whole lot of subunit context was required to understand the specific proposal you're making for the TestResult. It also *seems* like you're redesigning the TestResult for a single use case (distributed testing) with an api that looks quite "odd" for anything that isn't that use case. I'd rather see how we can make the TestResult play *better* with those requirements. That discussion probably belongs in another thread - or at the summit.
Right - all I wanted was to flag that you and I and any other interested parties should discuss this at the summit :).